3 Mistakes Women Make in the Bedroom

Instead of posting on this blog the past couple of weeks, I’ve been cruising the back alleys of the internet. There I stumbled across galtime.com, a website like many others, serving the needs of women in love and life 24 hours a day.

I read about the 3 Mistakes Women Make in the Bedroom that Dr. Jane Greer is most concerned about. There are, of course, many other mistakes women are prone to make, the silly little things, but these three are of a more pressing urgency than the others. Not that the others aren’t important! You should still read 6 Things Women Do That Scare Men Off, 7 Reasons Why You Don’t Want Sex, and 5 Ways to Be a Better Lover. Not to mention 5 Tips For Getting In “The Mood”. Because if you can’t figure that one out, your man’s going to leave you this very week.

Anyway, back to the urgent 3 Mistakes. Here’s a quote:

Mistake #1: Comfy Clothes
I know, ladies, that you want to be in those those comfortable nightgowns, those comfortable jammies, that you wear. But, honestly, the quickest turn-off to your partner or spouse are your comfy clothes. So, if you want to spice things up in your love life, shed those comfy clothes and find a ice, hot bra or a nice nighty, something you can be slinky, sexy and comfortable in that will be a TURN-ON to your partner.

Mistake #2: NOT Taking the Lead
Don’t wait to get asked to dance, meaning you’ve got to take the lead. You don’t have to wait for your partner to ask you to have sex or make love with them. Get involved, get into bed, take the lead and get your partner into bed with you. You’ll both have a lot of fun and enjoy yourselves.

Mistake #3: Criticism
It’s to be avoided at all costs. Nothing will turn off your partner faster than you telling him what you DON’T like and what you don’t want taking place. On the other hand, what will be a complete arousal and turn-on is letting him know what he CAN do to please you and what will excite you if he does it.

So, tell him what you like, wear those sexy clothes and, most importantly of all, take the lead so that you can have the fun you’re looking for!

Remember, ladies, the good doctor tells us that these are mistakes to be avoided AT ALL COSTS! Nothing ought to stand in the way of you keeping your man happy with what, let’s face it, has been pretty mediocre service. This is all good advice, but at the end of the day, Dr. Greer is a woman. If you ladies want a man’s take on these 3 Mistakes, The Giant is here for you. You can read my take, you can watch the video at the end of this post, or you can do both.

Giant Take on Mistake #1: Comfy Clothes

It is well known that husbands do not think it’s sexy when their wives wear hubby’s t-shirts. Wait. What?! Of course they do! And what about the sweet way some flannel pajama pants accentuate the plump shapeliness of the derriere? Or is that just me?

Even if it is just me…come on! Women, are you really going to wear black lacy panties all day every day? Or sneak off to change if there’s a chance of “intimacy”? Or wake up before your husband so you can put make-up on?

The real problem, of course, as it is with the other two “mistakes”, is men and husbands. If it is true that “the quickest turn-off to your partner or spouse are your comfy clothes”, then men are all evil assholes. Husbands, if comfy clothes are a turn-off, learn to look at your wife through new eyes. Because the ones you’re using now aren’t working.

It isn’t they who woo us. It is we who woo them. That means we come to them as they are, and we entreat their affection.

Giant Take on Mistake #2: NOT Taking the Lead

I’m not sure why “not” is all in caps.

Wives apparently mess up by NOT taking the lead.

I’m sure most husbands would be glad to have a wife who did their work for them. Wait a second…that’s already a thing! A few years into my marriage I suggested to my wife that it might be nice if she were a little more assertive, if she went after me once in a while.

Know what she did? She laughed at me and told me to be a man. Seriously. Those were her very words.

And that’s sexy.

Nothing wrong with wifey taking the lead. But husbands, you are men. You’re the hunter, you’re the wooer. And your biology backs that up. You’re always going to be going after her; if she came after you, it would only be for variety’s sake, because she will never come after you the way you go after her (although later on it will be okay if she comes after you). So be content with that. That’s your role. You’re the pursuer. Don’t pout and make her chase you; that’s at least as harmful to the female mind as an unresponsive and arbitrary woman is to her man’s wee little psyche.

Giant Take on Mistake #3: Criticism

When I initially read Dr. Greer’s blurb, I was reading for a laugh. Then I hit this one and I stopped laughing. It hit home a little more. I’ve had this exact conversation with my wife. The point made is not so much that women are always nagging and criticizing their men; it’s that women shouldn’t frame things negatively in bed. Less “don’t do that” and more “yes, do that”.

Great point for both sexes. But in sex, the man is usually the performer. He is the one who is doing it to her. He is more vulnerable to criticism because he is initiating and following through. Fair enough. Women should be considerate of that.

But the underlying assumption is the same stupid thing. That the problems in the bedroom are the woman’s fault. Nothing wrong with asking wifey to frame things more positively. But husbands ought to stop being whiney and susceptible and start being doers. You make it so that your wife feels comfy wearing comfy clothes. You make it so that your wife doesn’t have to take the lead when you’re actually the one who wants to have sex all the time. You be the one to set a positive atmosphere, to praise her beauty and her skill.

Stop whining. Maybe then your wives will stop being so insecure. If you want to be built up, build her up. If you tear her down, you’ll go down with her.

Anyone for a closing pun?

Buxom & Bonny In Bed & At Board

“We ate well and cheaply and drank well and cheaply and slept well and warm together and loved each other.”

Ernest Hemingway, A Moveable Feast

We ate, we drank, we slept, we loved. If you can keep it that simple, thanks be to God.

The quote makes me think of my wonderful wife and our wonderful marriage. Of course, it sums up what we do so well, but it’s also reminiscent of my wife’s own motto for marriage. I also like that the quote includes the word “cheaply”, which is a key part of our marital glue.

My wife’s motto in marriage also puts it neatly. “Sex, eat, sleep.”

When I first got married a pastor who was mentoring me (a Baptist who made the mistake of introducing me to Calvin) gave me his most important piece of advice. “Keep the pantry full. No matter how hard things get, make sure you keep the pantry full.” And there is immense wisdom in this. When Christians run in to trouble in their marriages they often want a hyper-spiritual meta-solution, instead of humbling themselves and taking care of practical things, like eating well, and drinking well, and sleeping well and warm together.

_________________________________________________

According to John Thrupp in The Anglo-Saxon Home: A History of the Domestic Institutions and Customs of England From the Fifth to the Eleventh Centuries, wives promised to be “bonny and buxom at bed and at board”.

Everything one needs to be bonny and buxom.

I’m going to talk about how awesome that is for husbands. If you don’t like that you can go read my moralizing for husbands while you suck on a lemon.

The bride’s vow, closely related to today’s traditional vows, is “I take thee John to be my wedded husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better or for worse, for richer and poorer, in sickness and health, to be bonny and buxom in bed and at board till death do us part, and thereto I plight thee my troth.”

A “troth”, by the way, is pledged loyalty and faithfulness, as in “betrothal”.

The groom’s vow was briefer, less beautiful, and less alliterative. “I take thee Alice to be my wedded wife, to have and to hold, at bed and at board, for fairer for fouler, for better or for worse, in sickness or in health, till death us do part.” It’s interesting to note as an aside here that the groom’s vow contains a promise to stay with her even if she gets old and wrinkly and ugly.

Just saying the words of the wife’s vow is a pleasure. They’re so bouncy! Try it, out loud: “Bonny and buxom in bed and at board.” Or maybe “Sassy and sweet in sack and at seat.” Sweet and bouncy…and bouncy goes so well with “buxom.” We all know what we think first when we hear the word “buxom”.

I’ll bet you don’t think “obedient and tractable”. Yep. That’s the first definition at Merriam-Webster, although it’s plainly labeled as obsolete. The word is from Middle English buxsum, from Old English būhsum; akin to Old English būgan to bend, or bow.

1. obsolete a: obedient, tractable b: offering little resistance : flexible <wing silently the buxom air — John Milton>
2. archaic: full of gaiety
3. vigorously or healthily plump; specifically: full-bosomed

Yes, every man reading this had already thought “full-bosomed”, but that’s the last thing mentioned by dictionary nerds, who are men we should all strive to be more like.

Every young man wants a wife who is flexible.

The oath the bride is giving is one of Christian submission to her husband. The most awesome thing about that is that we’re talking about cheerful obedience. You could even put a hyphen in there and turn that into one word. So we’re talking about cheerful-obedience, a much bally-hooed but seldom seen Christian quality. Buxom meant obedient and flexible, but it must have even then been a word charged with good cheer, since it followed “bonny” so closely, and since it evolved to mean “gaiety” and “bouncing big breasts”.

So Christian wives are called to cheerful obedience in bed and at the table. There are a lot of distractions, and lots of other work, but that’s the core of practical marriage. Thank God for this every day, o you husbands. And pray that you be made worthy.

Dialogue Toward Having a Baby, Illustrated By Children’s Books

The discussion began when I said, “There’s a wocket in my pocket.”

So Kimberly shouted throughout the house, “Bedtime for little bears!”

That being taken care of, I said, “Come on over, baby, and hop on pop!”

But she wanted to know, “Where’s walrus?”

So I told her, “Watch me grow, Kitten.”

She responded, “That is a very hungry caterpillar.”

That’s when I showed her the “Sweethearts of Rhythm”.

Kimberly announced she would recite aloud from “Falling Up”.

I said, “And that’s the wonderful way babies are made.”

To which she replied, “We’re having a home birth.”

And that was pretty much all the talking we did.

Marriage & Sexuality Debates: Giving Up The High Ground

Battles and kerfuffles erupt all the time between Christians and pagans, and between Christians and Christians. When that happens, why do those who use terms in a historically confirmed and orthodox way keep giving away that advantage and repackaging themselves? Certainly holding to an old or traditional idea doesn’t make you right. But if you do hold such a position, why would you give away in debate the advantage of getting to set the terms of the fight?

In this video I discuss how that has happened in some discussions on sexuality and marriage.

5 Songs About Sex Christian Couples Should Listen To

Ah, Christian husbands. Sweet, sweet Christian husbands. Caught up in the carnival of oversexualization and shame that is our society, trying to navigate your marriages, your wives, your sexual sins and hangups, and your immense horndogginess, all at once.

That’s awkward. Also, I feel awkward about using the word “immense” just now.

May I suggest that your marriage could use a little more rock n’ roll? You know, from a Biblical perspective. And make that rock hard. Make that roll smooth.

Each of these songs can be your guide through different times and phases of your walk with wifey. Share these with her. These are for couples. Some are more directed toward husbands, some more toward wives. As always, there are no accusations, but mutual support and encouragement.

1. Keep Your Hands To Yourself, Georgia Satellites

During certain times you might want to keep your hands to yourself. For example, during the gentle phase many call “courtship”, and the less pious call “dating”, during which this song is clearly set.

No hugging, no kissing until you make her your wife.

Once she is your wife, this song can also be helpful during your brief times of mutual sexual abstention, as prescribed in 1 Corinthians 7:5, for devotion to prayer. Always remember, however, St. Paul’s admonition that this should only be for a brief time. It is always good to “come together again”. And I think you know what I mean.

Please don’t nag your woman. Men are always in peril of being sexual “drippers“, all the while believing that their wives are the only nag in the marriage. If you’ve memorized the “Can We ______?” in Mark Driscoll’s sex book, you might be in danger of being a dripper. Consider keeping your hands to yourself for a time.

 

2. Abracadabra, Steve Miller Band

Husband, let your woman know a) that you want her, b) that her deeds in the bedroom are appreciated, and that c) her deeds in the bedroom are effective.

Your wife should know that you want to reach out and grab her. Every wife wants that from her husband all the time. Obviously you both have other things to do besides grab each other, but a standard part of the Christian marriage package that a husband should give his wife is the confidence that he desires her. You know, like a burning flame full of desire. Appreciation and gratitude to God and wife are the order of the day if one wishes to let the fire get higher.

Once the wife knows she is wanted and appreciated, she is better able to make the husband say “you make me hot, you make me sigh. Keep me burning for your love…” Because it’s not about some sort of technique or ancient Eastern secret. It’s about love and enthusiasm. It’s about kindness and consideration. You know, mature married stuff.

 

3. I Want A Little Sugar In My Bowl, Nina Simone

Okay, this isn’t really rock n’ roll. But it belongs here anyway.

O husbands, have you complaints about the wife of your youth? Pray to God for mercy and realize that everything is your responsibility. Yours. You aren’t to be your wife’s accuser before God; you’re to be her advocate. You can’t worry if she’s taking care of her end or looking after your “needs”. So…you better start giving.

Give her some sugar in her bowl. Give her some honey deep in her soul.

What’s the matter, daddy? Come on, save her soul. I ain’t fooling. Now that’s a theologically profound idea. It might even provide an insight into the always difficult 1 Timothy 2:15.

In your entire marriage, and in your chambers, o husband, you be the generous one. Give her some sugar. Right in her bowl.

 

4. Afternoon Delight, Starland Vocal Band

Why wait until the middle of the cold dark night?

Everything’s a little clearer in the light of day. Be open, be communicative, and make love all day. And those of you who know me know that I cannot have used the phrase “make love” casually, since I view its use as a euphemism as deplorable. “Make love” is still listed in Merriam-Webster as to “woo or court” before it’s listed as to “neck, pet, engage in sexual intercourse”.

So make love to your wife all day, send her texts, make phone calls, do favors, speak sweet nothings, whatever. Consider yourself to be in a never-ending state of wooing; win your wife every day.

Do this, and your sky rocket might be in flight afternoon, evening, and night. Maybe even in the morning, before you’ve had your coffee, which is difficult but worth doing.

 

5. Squeeze Box, The Who

There are principally two things that Christians can learn from this tune (I say “principally” because the rich lessons that can be extracted from this subtle work are surely myriad).

First, regularity and frequency must be an important part of any marriage. For the mommy and daddy in this song, that meant all night, every night. That, it seems, was what their marriage required to be healthy. That might not be the way for all couples, but each should find their own rhythm. Where Afternoon Delight reminded us that hubby should always be in woo mode, Squeeze Box might serve to remind wives not to make their husbands work too hard.

Second, in a non-creepy way, it’s a family affair. Squeeze Box is about a mommy and a daddy. I’m not saying that you should make it so that the kids can’t sleep or that the neighbors are kept awake by the “music”. Modesty is meet and right.

But modesty is a glorious and strong thing, very different from shame. Marriage is fundamentally a sexual relationship. That is what it is. It is the only Biblical sexual relationship (depending on how one uses the word “sexual” I here add distractingly). Your neighbors should know that you’re married. Your kids should be confident that mommy and daddy love each other. They may not understand it now, but when they’re older and trying to figure out how to play the squeeze box in their own marriages, they’ll look back and see how you made music, and whether or not you loved it. You’re teaching your kids about music right now, whether they hear you occasionally from the other side of the house or not.

So if nothing else, do it for the kids.

Impressing Others, Impressing My Woman

Last weekend I was at a neighbor’s Independence Day party. Beer was being drunk, children were running around with sparklers, mulleted rednecks were playing terrible terrible terrible basketball on a hoop placed in the packed dirt and grass of this guy’s yard. I was sitting about twenty yards from the hoop, talking to an older gentleman about his days as a machinist. The ball rolled toward me, so I scooped it up, continuing my conversation, beer in hand, and chucked the ball at the rim with that sweet little rotation you know is a part of my shot.

Nothing but net. I sat back down with supreme nonchalance as the crowd erupted.

I won’t pretend I didn’t love it.

A few days later I was at a construction site with a basketball-loving co-worker. There was another basket on the grass of this house’s yard, and a ball lying about ten yards from the hoop. I picked up the ball, related the above story to this friend of mine, and as I described taking the first shot, I chucked the ball I was holding at the basket. I had to keep the shot low to get through the branches, but there was never any doubt. It rattled in.

I was sure to remind my friend a few more times that day that I’d made a shot while talking about making a shot. That, to coin a phrase, is so meta.

So as we headed out of the house this morning I picked up one of our basketballs and called out to my wife. I told Kimberly the story of the first shot, and of the crowd’s glorious reaction. I told her how I’d cold-bloodedly hit a shot while talking trash to my friend. And as I told her that I’d “made a shot while I was talking about making a shot”, I launched the ball at the rim without a shadow of a doubt that it was going straight in.

It slammed into the front of the rim.

Why am I never able to impress my woman?

The French & N.C.’s Marriage Amendment

Last week when the wife was hanging out with a friend, the topic of French people came up. The friend was frustrated because she had been treated rudely and condescendingly by a French person. So this sophisticated and cultured woman vented a bit, making the comment that every French person she’d ever met has been rude.

There might have been a bit of exaggeration on her part, due to the offense she’d taken. I’ve certainly known some nice-ish French people. But most of the Frenchies I’ve known have been sort of rude.

Of course, what’s taking place is simply cultural crossed wires. These rude French people aren’t actually being rude to us on purpose, are they?

Well, yes and no. Mostly yes, but it’s nothing personal.

Contemplez-vous cette femme ridicule, cavalier.

To the French, conformity to the normes courantes are a requirement for respectability. Americans are individualistic to a vicious fault; this leads to a self-regard that is relatively unaffected by the opinions of others. “Self-esteem” is a real thing to Americans, but is meaningless to a Frenchman, to whom estime is the admiration you develop for people you have a relationship with. The French have no self-esteem, but they have their honneur, which is defined by others. The estime that others hold you in is what defines your self-regard as a Frenchman. Whereas Americans have historically been aggressively individualistic, the French are as thoroughly a face-saving honor culture as the Japanese.

That is what leads to the bullying and rudeness. Being witty and clever is rewarded in French culture, as is philosophy and academic research. But only when it falls into accepted norms. This is why the French Academy spends so much time making pronouncements regarding the French language, and fighting change to a point that looks ridiculous to us. It is why their philosophers and fashionistas are so famed for their brutality toward les étrangers. It is because that which we have all agreed upon is what is right.

Therefore an intellectual mob mentality. When French people were rude to you (assuming a real conversation, not a request for directions to the metro) you noticed that it was done in a very laissez faire sort of way, which only offended you more. But it was done casually because it was done instinctively, not personally.

Europeans all agree that you should have few children; it’s not rude of a French person to talk about how you have too many kids because it is you who is outside the norm. Europeans agree that religion and religiosity are barriers to enlightenment; it’s not rude of a French person to tell you that you’re stupid and superstitious because it is you who is outside the norm. The French agree that there’s a radical separation between one’s work and one’s “private life”; it’s not rude of a French person to tell you that you’re overreacting to that politician’s scandal because it is you who is outside the norm.

French society allows for a range of what is intellectually and behaviorally acceptably, of course. It is, after all, a human society. But you’ll know it when you bump up against the boundaries of what is acceptable. The French learn early on that they’ll get bashed by those who are older and more established if they step outside the norm, so they become masters of navigating that river. But they will (almost) never put the boat up and go exploring in the woods.

____________________________________________________________

Well, that was a nice little article, wasn’t it? What does it have to do with the controversial recent amendment to North Carolina marriage law?

It has to do not so much with the referendum and amendment as it does with some of the reactions I’ve seen.

On Facebook you could tell the moment the results were cemented. That’s because there were hordes of people ready with one-liners, photos, cartoons, and memes galore. They all exploded out early in the evening. These were not attacks on the theological, anthropological, or political ideas in play. They were all “look how stupid those people are”.

This is one of the least rude ones out there.

A republic is representational, but is structured to protect the rights and political power of minorities as well as majorities. It is easy to see how the political life and structure of these United States has changed over the years as it became less of a republic and more of a democracy, in which the straight majority decides all. American intellectual life, of course, has always been ahead of and informing the political trajectory.

The glory of American intellectual life was its individualism. Sadly, the natural entropic course of that is atomization to the point of becoming the demos masses. We have decayed intellectually to the point that our thinking is utterly defined by the polarized group we belong to. Anyone outside that norm is to be ridiculed instead of engaged.

We are becoming like the French. If you say something contrary to what the Academy says, you are only to be mocked. Public dialogue and political discourse has never been so easy!

If anyone disagrees with you and your group, they must be stupid. You don’t need to talk to them or even respect them. Just start calling people names and bashing away.

The Magic of eHarmony

According to jezebel.com, the pseudo-science behind dating websites is total crap. Can we have a show of hands among our readers to see how many of you are surprised? Oh, no one?

It would be fair to ask why I’m talking about this on a site that is purportedly dedicated to excursions in virility. Consider this a tangent. Or consider it tangentially related to the primary mission. One of my ever-present secondary objectives is to destroy “romantic” soul-matey ideas of love and marriage.

If eharmony wanted to prove that its method is superior to other matchmaking methods, it wouldn’t be tough, says Karney — all they’d have to do is perform an experiment that compares the success of relationships matched using their algorithm as compared to those cultivated with another algorithm or with no algorithm at all.

That, I am sure, is true. Apparently they haven’t done this, and Dr. Karney wishes that they would. Accurate labeling practices and all that. Fair enough, although eHarmony’s making no medical claims, and no one is harmed in the making of their films…at least not without understanding that this is love, people, and love isdangereuse.

Here’s the weird bit for me.

So it seems a little strange that a guy [the company's founder, Neil Clark Warren] who “doesn’t like research” would base a company’s entire oeuvre on a fake idea that entire teams of nerds are pouring over tics on a data sheet, pouring primary colored liquid into beakers and watching it bubble, tabulating and cross-referencing and calibrating until a perfect match is found.

Karney doubts whether such an algorithm could even exist. Relationships, he explained to LA Weekly, don’t begin because of actual similarities, but people who are in relationships project similarities onto their partnership. That is, if you’re spending a ton of time around someone you think is rad, you’ll try to hunt for elements of your own personality that match up with the other person’s rad-ness. That’s why looking to long-married couples for matchmaking is ultimately a fool’s errand — they have learned to think they’re very similar to each other over the course of years. They’ve grown together; they weren’t made for each other.

Ms. Jezebel as incarnate in the form of web-writer Erin Gloria Ryan, the answer to your challenge is in your text itself. You say that eHarmony’s equations can’t possibly work because they are trying to recreate the act of two people believing they want to be together, who end up shaping and changing reality to create that perfect match. They think they should be together, so they are together.

Well, perfect. That seems to be exactly what eHarmony does. And the pitch with the nerds, data sheets, and beakers only makes it more effective. They make two people believe they should be together, thereby greatly increasing the chances that they will shape reality to create that perfect match. That’s the magic, and it shouldn’t be a surprise.

I’m not addressing anything brought up in the study cited by the Jezebel article, since I haven’t read it. It sounds interesting and may have a lot of merit. But why hate on someone saying “You two should really be together, you’d be perfect for each other. Oh, you’re not sure? Don’t worry, I have a DOCTORATE IN LOVE, you should definitely give this a shot.”

It could very well be that the folks at eHarmony do not share my cynical belief that any man and woman who are willing to share, sacrifice, and work their love will find love. There’s no finding a soulmate in poetry, and there’s no finding a soulmate in compatibility tests. There’s just doing love.

Are there real “compatibility” issues? Sure, I’ll admit to that if we don’t call it “compatibility”. But it’s not hard to find the necessary degree of “compatibility”. It’s hard to find two people who are willing to be unselfish. If being duped into thinking the person across from you is your mathematically perfect match helps you be unselfish, more power to eHarmony. Or to my personal favorite, Reformed Singles. Brown chicken brown cow!

This is the reformedsingles.com stock photo. Could they not find a nice bearded fellow? I mean, we're Reformed here, by Poseidon's seaweed beard!

Giant Male Virgin #4: The Patient Pastor

Boilerplate reminder: there has been a good bit of chatter about this series going on, through email, facebook, etc. The overwhelming majority of the responses have been positive. However, agree or disagree with me or the guest posters, I do want to repeat a point I made in the original post for this series. We’re talking about what these Christians believe is best. How many Christians actually manage to do what is best? By the very nature of the way I’ve asked the questions, these men have succeeded (to one degree or another) where others have failed. Not one of them will not confess that this is by God’s grace alone. Nobody’s is saying anybody here is better than anybody else. They are saying that obeying God is better than disobeying, and they’re sorting that out. But without any of the wishy-washiness that masquerades as piety these days. So please don’t be offended.

This post is part of a week-long series of first-person guest posts on male virginity amongst Christians. This post is by a pastor known simply as “one pastor I interviewed”. One of the most interesting parts of his story is how long he waited before getting married. All the other men posting this week married in their early twenties, including me. Not this stalwart.

Q:You were a virgin until you married. How old were you at that time?

I was in my mid-thirties when I got married.

Q: If a [Christian] man is not a virgin when he marries, how big a deal is that?

It’s a very big deal.

If the man’s sexual experiences include someone other than his wife, that means he has a lot of other women — and a lot of other experiences — he can compare his wife to. It’s entirely possible that in some way his wife will not measure up to one or more of these other women.

If he’s had sex with a bunch of women, chances are, too, that he’s “learned” some “lessons” about sex — and they may be entirely the wrong ones.

A Casanova doesn’t have to be a great lover. He isn’t interested in sticking around after the sexual act. He’s interested in his own pleasure and then he moves on. That is to say, so long as he has his orgasm, he doesn’t care about the woman — though chances are that in the hope he will stick around, she might even pretend that he was a great lover. So widespread promiscuity is horrible training for marriage.

But even if the man has had sex with only one woman, the one he eventually married, it still means that his sexual life was divided into two phases, illicit and licit — and the illicit phase had certain thrills that came from the very fact that the act was sinful at the time. Once married, however, not only is there all the guilt of the past relationship to carry into the marriage, but there’s also a training of sorts that gets carried over — good sex, exciting sex, is illicit sex. But when you’re married, your sexual relations are lawful and therefore they lose the excitement, the adreniline rush, the “will she or won’t she” that characterized premarital sexual experience. And the only way to get that back is to have an affair.

Now having said all of that (and I could say more about guilt and how it affects men long after the sin), I should also add that God is very gracious, that a man who has fallen can be restored, and that if a woman finds a godly man who did fall prior to marriage but who is now walking in repentance, that previous sin shouldn’t necessarily be a deal-breaker. What he’s doing with the sin is more important than the sin itself.

Q: I’ve noticed that people have a hard time believing a young man could stay a virgin by choice. That is, that sex is impossible to resist for any length of time. I’m sure that it was difficult, but how difficult was it, really? What kind of struggle was it?

Sex is certainly possible to resist. The difficulty, though, is not just resisting having sex. You can set up boundaries, refuse to be alone with a woman or guard the circumstances in which you’d ever be alone with her, etc. You might just not be around anyone whom you find attractive. There are a number of factors.

But what’s harder, I think, is dealing with other sexual temptations (lust, sexual fantasies, pornography). A guy can be committed to not having sex with a woman and may not have a girlfriend or whatever, but at the same time be bombarded with other sexual temptations which he finds very difficult to resist — all of which could also make it very difficult to resist if, say, a sexy woman came on to the guy. That is, the sexual fantasies are training in infidelity.

Q: You must be some kind of wuss. So must other “wait ’til we’re married” guys. What do you say to that?

Nope. A lot of guys say they want to go all the way with a girl, but they really want to go only about six to eight inches. If they wanted to go all the way, they’d woo her and wed her and have babies with her and provide for her and get up in the night to take care of her and those babies and eventually, if they don’t die first, bury her.

And it takes more of a man to do that than to simply have sex with a woman.

Q: How would you compare the dynamic of being a virgin until 35 to that of a man who marries in his mid-twenties?

I’m not sure I can answer that well, given that I have experience of the former but not of the latter. But I would think that a guy who marries earlier would have less of a struggle in some ways. But it’s hard for me to put into words….

In general, though, Don Miller is correct in his Blue Like Jazz (which I found to be a mixed bag: some good stuff, some bad stuff, and some squishy stuff down at the bottom).

He has some excellent chapters on being single, and he points out how when you’re single for a long time, your personal bubble expands to fill your whole house, even your whole existence. His mind, he says, was like a radio station stuck on one channel: “K-Don: All Don, all the time.”

The longer a guy is single — unless he’s deliberately squelching his self-centeredness — the more and more selfish he’ll become.

Sex is pleasurable, but it’s also (in a sense) work. It is supposed to involve putting someone else ahead of your self. But if you’ve been training yourself in selfishness over the course of years and years and in every sphere of your life, then you’re likely to be selfish here, too.

Giant Male Virgin #2: The Rock Star

Boilerplate reminder: there has been a good bit of chatter about this series going on, through email, facebook, etc. The overwhelming majority of the responses have been positive. However, agree or disagree with me or the guest posters, I do want to repeat a point I made in the original post for this series. We’re talking about what these Christians believe is best. How many Christians actually manage to do what is best? By the very nature of the way I’ve asked the questions, these men have succeeded (to one degree or another) where others have failed. Not one of them will not confess that this is by God’s grace alone. Nobody’s is saying anybody here is better than anybody else. They are saying that obeying God is better than disobeying, and they’re sorting that out. But without any of the wishy-washiness that masquerades as piety these days. So please don’t be offended.

Robert Privette is a web-developer at Footstone, and lead singer for Six Days From Sunday. He was also Joffre’s best man.

Q: You were a virgin until you married. How old were you at that time?

I was twenty.

Q: If a [Christian] man is not a virgin when he marries, how big a deal is that?

As many issues as my wife and I worked through early in our marriage, I don’t think that non-virginity would have been an insurmountable hurdle. As many things as I have been forgiven for, I also don’t think that it would have been a spiritual death blow. That said, in our relationship, trust has been paramount. I’m thankful that we weren’t faced with the additional challenge of working through past sexual relationships. I imagine it’s tough.

Q: I’ve noticed that people have a hard time believing a young man could stay a virgin by choice. That is, that sex is impossible to resist for any length of time. I’m sure that it was difficult, but how difficult was it, really? What kind of struggle was it?

I think it would have been more difficult to only have sex once. Naivety isn’t generally considered a desired trait, but happy ignorance is a great friend of virginity (you can’t miss what you don’t know). The challenge was to stay away from the boundaries instead of getting as close as possible. Fences are no match for speeding cars. I’ve never been good at saying no in the heat of the moment.

Q: You must be some kind of wuss. So must other “wait ’til we’re married” guys. What do you say to that?

I’m hot. Ask my wife.

Q: What good did staying a virgin until marriage do you?

There’s something wonderful about the pursuit. Heart-stopping romantic love flourishes before the conquest. I got really good at loving my wife. We’re each other’s first, best and only. There is no comparison, no guilt, no secret, no wondering. She knows that the Voice I heeded before our marriage is the same one that now tells me to keep our bed holy and to lay down my life for my wife.

Q: How would you say it impacted your marriage? your sex life?

Marriage is great! Sex is great! (t-shirt anyone?) It’s hard to imagine the intimacy, the oneness, I have with my wife if I had given little bits of my heart and body to other girls along the way.